Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Denver Mods 7/26/84) 6/24/83; site drutx.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!drutx!wed
From: wed@drutx.UUCP (DeibertWE)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: (re, re, re) BULLPUKEY
Message-ID: <3379@drutx.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 26-Jul-85 15:38:16 EDT
Article-I.D.: drutx.3379
Posted: Fri Jul 26 15:38:16 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 28-Jul-85 13:50:09 EDT
Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Denver
Lines: 41



> I wish people would stop using the word responsibility in arguments
> about abortion when not all people agree about what is a
> responsibility.

People won't.  Why should they?  People have their point(s) of view,
the same as you have yours.  :-)

Not all people agree on much of anything in this newsgroup.

> The use of the concept of 'convenience' to differentiate between 
> abortions is similarly clouded.

For many of us the concept of 'convenience' to differentiate between
abortions is crystal clear. (Another example of widely varying 
opinions.  See the following.)

> The real issue here is not what is 'right', since different people
> have widely varying opinions about the subject, but whether or not
> the government should legislate the legality of abortion.

If the real issue here is whether or not the government should legislate
the legality of abortion:

	1.  Is it 'right' for government to legislate the legality of
	    abortion?

	2.  Is it 'responsible' for government to legislate the legality
	    of abortion?

	3.  Would the answers to the questions above be widely varying 
	    'opinions' about the subject?


William D.


{We the people.........}