Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!mhuxn!mhuxr!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxd!rlr
From: rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Rich Rosen)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: \"Words mean what I pay them to mean . . .\"
Message-ID: <1348@pyuxd.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 28-Jul-85 21:54:33 EDT
Article-I.D.: pyuxd.1348
Posted: Sun Jul 28 21:54:33 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 31-Jul-85 00:46:23 EDT
References: <396@cmu-cs-spice.ARPA>
Organization: Whatever we're calling ourselves this week
Lines: 13

> Obviously, everyone doesn't believe that this applies to unborn babies or else
> there would be no abortion debate.  And if you do believe so strongly in this
> premise, why did you spend so much time trying to convince us of a falsehood
> ("the fetus is not alive") instead of addressing the main issues?
>                                         -- Thomas Newton

Why do I bother?  Beats me.  You're obviously not willing to listen to
statements of fact of any sort, only statements that agree with your predefined
position.  You should go into pompous assertion as a career, you do it so well.
(Falsehood?)
-- 
"Wait a minute.  '*WE*' decided???   *MY* best interests????"
					Rich Rosen    ihnp4!pyuxd!rlr