Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site rtech.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!lll-crg!dual!unisoft!mtxinu!rtech!eric
From: eric@rtech.UUCP (Eric Lundblad)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: RAW SPEAKERS
Message-ID: <579@rtech.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 30-Jul-85 01:51:28 EDT
Article-I.D.: rtech.579
Posted: Tue Jul 30 01:51:28 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 1-Aug-85 05:35:00 EDT
References: <3177@decwrl.UUCP>, <975@teddy.UUCP> <914@druxo.UUCP> <294@ttrdc.UUCP> <512@bonnie.UUCP>
Organization: Relational Technology, Alameda CA
Lines: 15

> I agree with the previous article that the horns give a superb bass
> response but I'm not too sure I would want a straight horn in the bass.
> The problem is that it gets kind of long and you start getting a time
> delay between the bass and midrange.  The folded horn is shorter and (to
> me) the time skew is not noticeable.

	All other things being equal, the time delay a horn introduces 
is the same whether the horn is straight or folded. Sound will take just
as long to exit a horn when it twists and turns as it does when it heads
straight out.

-- 

			Eric Lundblad
		   ucbvax!mtxinu!rtech!eric