Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.7 $; site trsvax
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!desoto!packard!ihnp1!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!convex!trsvax!mikey
From: mikey@trsvax
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: ?? Digital READY ?? (early EV s
Message-ID: <55100086@trsvax>
Date: Tue, 30-Jul-85 11:26:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: trsvax.55100086
Posted: Tue Jul 30 11:26:00 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 2-Aug-85 06:24:48 EDT
References: <1278@hound.UUCP>
Lines: 13
Nf-ID: #R:hound.UUCP:-127800:trsvax:55100086:000:612
Nf-From: trsvax!mikey    Jul 30 10:26:00 1985




I read somewhere about a year ago that "Digital Ready" was just a different
wheighting curve for power distribution.  I don't remember the example that
was given but it went something like a normal speaker is rated 100 watts.  
This means that depending on where the crossovers were, the midrange would 
have a rating of about 40 watts and the tweeter would have a rating of maybe
20 watts.  The same speaker rated "digital" would only be rated 75 watts 
because the new rating favored the higher frequencies.  I don't remember
there being any actuall difference in the speakers themselves.

mikey at trsvax