Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site psivax.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!oliveb!hplabs!sdcrdcf!psivax!tommie From: tommie@psivax.UUCP (Tom Levin) Newsgroups: net.audio Subject: Re: tube vs solid-state preamps Message-ID: <584@psivax.UUCP> Date: Tue, 30-Jul-85 16:23:37 EDT Article-I.D.: psivax.584 Posted: Tue Jul 30 16:23:37 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 3-Aug-85 03:26:37 EDT References: <482@micomvax.UUCP> Reply-To: tommie@psivax.UUCP (Tom Levin) Organization: Pacesetter Systems Inc., Sylmar, CA Lines: 25 Summary: In article <482@micomvax.UUCP> diag@micomvax.UUCP (Hardware Diagnostics Group) writes: >i am in the market for a pre-amp in the $500-1000 range, and have narrowed >down my choice from among a time-constrained selection to a tube >(conrad-johnson) and a solid-state (bryston) preamp. some audio people have >discouraged me from getting a tube pre-amp, claiming that the tubes require >frequent replacement and that they are noisier than semiconductors. It is my humble opinion that a good solid state preamp like the Bryston will sound just as good if not better than a tube unit of similar price. Besides, tube equipment is kinda like records...the more you use them, the worse they sound. Then you will always be paranoid about when to get new tubes. It's not that conrad-johnson doesn't make excellent equipment, it's just that i'm into a low maintenance lifestyle (That's why I bought a cd player). I suggest you get the bryston! (or a Mark Levinson, or a Perrueaux, or a ....) Happy Listening! -- .----------------------------------------------------------------------------. | Tom Levin {ttidca|sdcrdcf|logico|scgvaxd|bellcore}!psivax!tommie | | Pacesetter Systems Inc. | | | | "Love won't come near me... she don't even hear me... | | she walks by my vacancy sign..." - Jackson Browne | |____________________________________________________________________________|