Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 8/23/84; site ucbcad.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!ucbvax!ucbcad!klein
From: klein@ucbcad.UUCP (Mike Klein)
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: Why negative camber on Triumphs?
Message-ID: <76@ucbcad.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 18-Jul-85 18:23:10 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucbcad.76
Posted: Thu Jul 18 18:23:10 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 20-Jul-85 09:08:44 EDT
Organization: UC Berkeley CAD Group, Berkeley, CA
Lines: 18

At least half of the Triumphs I see on the road, and probably more,
have an unreal amount of negative camber on the rear wheels.  Why is
this?

P.S. Negative camber is when the tops of the tires are closer together
than the bottoms... the car looks like this:

         ------------------
         |                |
  left  /|                |\ right
  wheel/ |                | \wheel
      /  ------------------  \
     /                        \
-- 

		-Mike Klein
		...!ucbvax!ucbmerlin:klein	(UUCP)
		klein%ucbmerlin@berkeley	(ARPA)