Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Denver Mods 7/26/84) 6/24/83; site drutx.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!drutx!mrl
From: mrl@drutx.UUCP (LongoMR)
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: Re: Misrepresentation
Message-ID: <48@drutx.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 2-Aug-85 14:07:33 EDT
Article-I.D.: drutx.48
Posted: Fri Aug  2 14:07:33 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 6-Aug-85 07:54:31 EDT
References: <187@galbp.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Denver
Lines: 21

> I've got a wierd situation and I was wondering if this has happened to
> anyone else.  Recently I bought a used 1984 Ford Ranger XL, from a close
> friend.  This friend bought the truck new from a local Ford Dealer.
> On the invoice and sales contract, it says the truck is supplied with
> a V6 engine.  But I noticed it was a only a 4 cylinder!  
> 
> Has this happened to anyone else?  What, if any, compensation am I entitled
> to?  At the very minimum, Ford (or the dealer), should compensate for the
> difference between the V6 engine (for which my friend was billed) and
> the 4-cylinder engine that was delivered.
> 
> Wolf Herda

Seems to me that your friend is (was) the one entitled to compensation,
if any. Did you buy the truck with the understanding from your friend
that it had a 6 cylinder engine in it? If so, you ought to be 
getting compensation from him/her. The Ford dealer did nothing to
you. I can't understand why you are holding it responsible. Perhaps
your friend already got compensated. 

	Mark Longo	...!ihnp4!drutx!mrl