Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site umich.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!mb2c!umich!lp
From: lp@umich.UUCP (Lee Pearson)
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: Re: Cincinnati Microwave Radar Detectors
Message-ID: <208@umich.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 5-Aug-85 16:51:11 EDT
Article-I.D.: umich.208
Posted: Mon Aug  5 16:51:11 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 6-Aug-85 12:45:17 EDT
References: <451@moncol.UUCP>
Reply-To: lp@eecs.UUCP (Lee Pearson)
Organization: University of Michigan, EECS Dept., Ann Arbor, MI
Lines: 27
Summary: 

In article <451@moncol.UUCP> ben@moncol.UUCP (Bennett Broder) writes:
>I recently ordered a Passport radar detector, and while I am waiting a
>couple of weeks for them to catch up with their backlog, I wonder
>whether I shouldn't have ordered an Escort instead.
>
>Has anyone performed or read about a comparison test of these units?
>More specifically, is the Passport as good as the Escort in the
>critical areas of X-band detection and resistance to falsing?
>
>I'd appreciate anything you could share with me.
>
>Ben Broder
>..vax135!petsd!moncol!ben
>..ihnp4!princeton!moncol!ben

I've owned a passport for about 3 months, after owning an escort for 
five years, and am extremely pleased with it.  From my subjective 
evaluation, I feel that the performance is roughly comparable to the 
escort.  I also find that I use the passport more often, due to its 
smaller size.  

If you are unhappy about your decision, I know several people who would
gladly trade their escort for your passport.


	Lee Pearson
	{ihnp4, pur-ee, mb2c}!umich!lp