Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.7 $; site ccvaxa
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!ccvaxa!wombat
From: wombat@ccvaxa.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.bugs.4bsd
Subject: Re: Bug in isatty (all systems!)
Message-ID: <5700002@ccvaxa>
Date: Wed, 24-Jul-85 23:44:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: ccvaxa.5700002
Posted: Wed Jul 24 23:44:00 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 28-Jul-85 15:05:42 EDT
References: <965@sdcsvax.UUCP>
Lines: 20
Nf-ID: #R:sdcsvax.UUCP:-96500:ccvaxa:5700002:000:866
Nf-From: ccvaxa.UUCP!wombat    Jul 24 22:44:00 1985


Yes, but try as I might I could not convince the tech writers to leave in my
favorite "BUG" note, from the tunefs(8) page: "You can tune a file system,
but you can't tune a fish."


"When you are about to die, a wombat is better than no company at all."
				Roger Zelazny, *Doorways in the Sand*

						Wombat
					ihnp4!uiucdcs!ccvaxa!wombat

/* Written 11:46 am  Jul 21, 1985 by jww@sdcsvax.UUCP in ccvaxa:net.bugs.4bsd */
> In article <243@cuuxb.UUCP> dbaker@cuuxb.UUCP (Darryl Baker) writes:
>     Gould however has done the correct thing, They renamed it 'Special
> Considerations' (rather well named neh?).
The Gould folks tell me they can't call it "Bugs" (Everyone has enough
problems with those anyway) for marketting reasons.  But at least they
left it in.  I don't care what it's called, as long as it's there.
/* End of text from ccvaxa:net.bugs.4bsd */