Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: notesfiles
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!tektronix!hplabs!hp-pcd!hpfcms!tatge
From: tatge@hpfcms.UUCP (tatge)
Newsgroups: net.cycle
Subject: Re: Orphaned Response
Message-ID: <43300056@hpfcms.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 15-Jul-85 13:26:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: hpfcms.43300056
Posted: Mon Jul 15 13:26:00 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 21-Jul-85 23:53:50 EDT
References: <680@water.UUCP>
Organization: Hewlett-Packard - Fort Collins, CO
Lines: 14
Nf-ID: #R:water:680:hpfcms:43300056:37777777600:695
Nf-From: hpfcms!tatge    Jul 15 09:26:00 1985

You should have had plenty of room for the 120/90 on your RZ.
I would guess, that if you had added an extra master link in your
chain, you would have been fine.  I have run a 130/90 K391 on the
rear of mine and had no problem, but I did have to back the axle
all the way back in the swing arm slot.  I don't think you 
should really go back to a 110/90 unless you want to.  If you 
want a rear tire that works really well and looks good on the
RZ than put on a Michelin Hi-Sport 130/70.  I've run those on my
RZ super bike and RZ production racer with good luck.  Also check my
note on the new Conti sport tires.  

                   George Tatge
		   Fort Collins, CO
		   ihnp4!hpfcla!tatge
#! rnew