Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2A (XREF PATCH) 05/16/85; site neuro1.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!neuro1!sob
From: sob@neuro1.UUCP (Stan Barber)
Newsgroups: net.emacs
Subject: Re: Looking at people's code.
Message-ID: <523@neuro1.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 2-Aug-85 18:53:13 EDT
Article-I.D.: neuro1.523
Posted: Fri Aug  2 18:53:13 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 4-Aug-85 09:42:34 EDT
References: <3134@decwrl.UUCP> <3232@cornell.UUCP> <420@kontron.UUCP> <210@kitty.UUCP>
Reply-To: sob@neuro1.UUCP (Stan Barber)
Organization: Neurophysiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tx
Lines: 18

In article <210@kitty.UUCP> peter@kitty.UUCP (Peter DaSilva) writes:
>What about Phoenix, the Rice UNIX-under-VMS system. Wollongong sucessfully sued
>on the grounds that Rice had a Eunice license when they developed Phoenix. This
>strikes me is vaguely bogus, but I was careful to refuse a copy of TERMLIB when
>I was writing my own version for the same reason.


WRONG WRONG WRONG

Wollongong did not successfully sue Rice. It was settled out-of-court.
Wollongong got more or less what they wanted, but it NEVER went to court.

NOTE: This is not an official opinion of Rice University or Baylor
College of Medicine, but it is fact.
-- 
Stan		uucp:{ihnp4!shell,rice}!neuro1!sob     Opinions expressed
Olan		ARPA:sob@rice.arpa		       here are ONLY mine &
Barber		CIS:71565,623   BBS:(713)660-9262      noone else's.