Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihdev.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!ihdev!rjv
From: rjv@ihdev.UUCP (ron vaughn)
Newsgroups: net.news.group,net.flame
Subject: Re: Death and resurrection of ***NET.FLAME*** (trumpet sound here)
Message-ID: <280@ihdev.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 18-Jul-85 22:07:56 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihdev.280
Posted: Thu Jul 18 22:07:56 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 20-Jul-85 08:27:43 EDT
References: <488@klipper.UUCP>
Reply-To: rjv@ihdev.UUCP (55224-R. J. Vaughn)
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 23
Xref: watmath net.news.group:3288 net.flame:11223
Summary: 

In article <488@klipper.UUCP> biep@klipper.UUCP (J. A. "Biep" Durieux) writes:
>[]
>	Why not create a mailing list mail.flame? Those who want it can get it,
>	and those who do not don't. If there is a real interest, it will sur-
>	vive, and there will be (non-)moderators. In the mean time mod.flame
>	could be created to contain well-written arguments on net abuse and
>	the like, which arguments I think clearly do serve a purpose.
>	Or perhaps net.etiquette would be more appropriate (both for general
>	and for net-etiquette).

this is absolutely stupid.  it goes against everything net.flame stands
for.  in mod.flame could i tell the world this is the dumbest thing
i've read in 16 days??  NO.  it would be moderated out.  net.flame is
the editoral page of the net.  it's where you let it all hang out, and
you tell YOUR side of the story, forget the other dumb-witted dirtbag
who can't see the RIGHT opinion.  see? SEE??  mod.flame?  ha.  ha-ha.
it is to laugh.

nothing personal, biep , i just had to show an example of what WOULDN'T
make it to mod.flame.  flame has a purpose, let's not even suggest
bogus wimpy quiche eating groups like mod.flame.

	ron "mrmachoimrightyougotohellyoudirtbag" vaughn