Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!brl-tgr!scooper
From: scooper@brl-tgr.ARPA (Stephan Cooper )
Newsgroups: net.flame,net.politics,net.legal,net.auto
Subject: Re: Re: DWI Crackdowns
Message-ID: <293@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Tue, 30-Jul-85 12:33:54 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.293
Posted: Tue Jul 30 12:33:54 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 1-Aug-85 05:40:46 EDT
References: <166@pyuxii.UUCP> <4056@alice.UUCP>
Reply-To: scooper@brl-tgr.ARPA (Stephan Cooper (CTAB) <scooper>)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab
Lines: 16
Xref: linus net.flame:10488 net.politics:9500 net.legal:1554 net.auto:6417

In article <4056@alice.UUCP> ark@alice.UUCP (Andrew Koenig) writes:
>> As to DWI, all that has to be done is to make DWI a crime for which
>> the auto can be confiscated.
>
>Aw c'mon, you wimp!  You can do a lot more than that!  For instance,
>how about making DWI a capital offense?!  Better yet, why not make
>DWI a capital offense for both the driver AND the owner of the car?
>That'll make sure people don't let other people steal their cars and
>then drive drunk!  For that matter how about killing off anyone who might
>possibly have prevented the crime?  Like all the driver's friends and
>relatives, anyone who didn't prevent the driver from drinking in the
>previous 24 hours, and all those people's friends and relatives?
>
>That'll stop it, don't you think?

Yes