Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/3/84; site grkermi.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!prls!amdimage!amdcad!decwrl!decvax!genrad!grkermi!andrew
From: andrew@grkermi.UUCP (Andrew W. Rogers)
Newsgroups: net.flame,net.auto,net.legal
Subject: Re: DWI Crackdowns and Car Confiscation
Message-ID: <535@grkermi.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 4-Aug-85 15:20:21 EDT
Article-I.D.: grkermi.535
Posted: Sun Aug  4 15:20:21 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 6-Aug-85 06:06:12 EDT
References: <264@SCIRTP.UUCP> <624@ttidcc.UUCP>
Reply-To: andrew@grkermi.UUCP (Andrew W. Rogers)
Organization: GenRad, Inc., Concord, Mass.
Lines: 19
Xref: linus net.flame:10568 net.auto:6487 net.legal:1611

In article <624@ttidcc.UUCP> hollombe@ttidcc.UUCP (The Polymath) writes:
>In article <264@SCIRTP.UUCP> todd@SCIRTP.UUCP (Todd Jones) writes:
>>I can see, under the car confiscation concept, that many people
>>will have "party cars" that are aging Pintos or Gremlins that
>>are used when the owner feels like raising hell.
>
>Obvious solution:
>
>When caught driving drunk not only is  the  vehicle  used  confiscated  but
>_all_  vehicles  belonging  to  the drunk driver are confiscated along with
>their driver's license. (If they haven't got a license they obviously don't
>need a car).

Obvious workaround:

Form a dummy corporation and register all the cars in *its* name.  (It worked
for E.F. Hutton, didn't it?)

AWR