Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!brl-tgr!tgr!geacc022%timevx@CIT-HAMLET.ARPA
From: geacc022%timevx@CIT-HAMLET.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: casts to (void)
Message-ID: <11@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Fri, 19-Jul-85 05:54:53 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.11
Posted: Fri Jul 19 05:54:53 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 20-Jul-85 12:33:52 EDT
Sender: news@brl-tgr.ARPA
Lines: 18


    Why should a cast to (void) be necessary in a statement like

	(void) printf("foo\n");

?  Why not say that the expression in the definition
<statement> = <expression>";" is automatically cast to type void?

    I put the casts to void in because they keep lint happy, but I'll
be the first to say they look ugly and impair readability...and why
are they really necessary, anyway?

			Gary Ansok
			GEACC022%TIMEVX @ CIT-HAMLET.ARPA
			GEA @ CALTECH.BITNET
			...ucbvax!cithep!timevx#geacc022

"All the world loves a straight man."