Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83 (MC840302); site boring.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!mcvax!boring!guido
From: guido@boring.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: AMSAA.ARPA network problems persist.
Message-ID: <6526@boring.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 23-Jul-85 03:09:01 EDT
Article-I.D.: boring.6526
Posted: Tue Jul 23 03:09:01 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 25-Jul-85 04:09:13 EDT
References: <11662@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Reply-To: guido@mcvax.UUCP (Guido van Rossum)
Organization: "Stamp Out BASIC" Committee, CWI, Amsterdam
Lines: 12
Apparently-To: rnews@mcvax.LOCAL

In article <11662@brl-tgr.ARPA> towson@AMSAA.ARPA (SECAD) writes:
>Fellow CP/Mers - It seems that I was a bit hasty in sending my last message.
>[...]                           Thus, we can send packets out, but no one out
>in netland knows the address to use for sending packets back to us.

Not only this, but the packets you send out end up everywhere except in
info-cpm.  Perhaps it would be better not to send out packets, not even
to inform "Fellow CP/Mers" (would you admit belonging to those? :-) of
the failure.

[net.lang.c is becoming total garbage, so I think I could add my share to
the chaos.  Guido.]