Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.7 $; site convexs
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!convex!convexs!ayers
From: ayers@convexs.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.legal
Subject: Re: DWI Crackdowns;Motorcycle sente
Message-ID: <17500005@convexs>
Date: Thu, 1-Aug-85 16:53:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: convexs.17500005
Posted: Thu Aug  1 16:53:00 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 4-Aug-85 08:05:21 EDT
References: <1019@ulysses.UUCP>
Lines: 29
Nf-ID: #R:ulysses.UUCP:-101900:convexs:17500005:000:987
Nf-From: convexs.UUCP!ayers    Aug  1 15:53:00 1985



> Why not just pull the license of a DWI?  Because judges and juries are
> reluctant to prevent someone from being able to get to work; if they
> have a motorcycle license, they have no excuse.

I'm not about to buy some lame excuse that the poor  bastard won't be
able to get to  work.   Let 'em  walk or  take public transportation.
They should have thought of the  potential problems  of driving while
intoxicated BEFORE they got behind the wheel.  

			Doug Hosking
			Convex Computer Corp.
			Richardson, TX
			{allegra, ihnp4, uiucdcs}!convex!hosking
/* End of text--------------------------------- */



As is not unusual, a point has been missed.  No one stated (or asked) 
anything about your feelings, my feelings, or even "common sense" 
(whatever that is) -- the statement was and is true:  "judges and 
juries are reluctant to prevent someone from being able to get to 
work" and perceive yanking a DL as just that.  Sorry...


				blues, II

			(This is reality, Greg)