Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site amdcad.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!gatech!amdcad!phil
From: phil@amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai)
Newsgroups: net.legal
Subject: Re: Seat Belts
Message-ID: <2364@amdcad.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 5-Aug-85 02:37:12 EDT
Article-I.D.: amdcad.2364
Posted: Mon Aug  5 02:37:12 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 6-Aug-85 03:48:06 EDT
References: <316@baylor.UUCP> <145@batman.UUCP> <2193@amdcad.UUCP> <1385@peora.UUCP> <1026@mhuxt.UUCP> <2104@iddic.UUCP>
Reply-To: phil@amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai)
Organization: AMD, Sunnyvale, California
Lines: 16

I saw an assertion somewhere (not on USENET) that 1) air bags are better
than seat belts in protecting against the kind of accidents that seat belts
are good for and 2) air bags are good in some accidents which seat belts
can't handle at all.

This sounds amazing (unbelieveable) to me but I'd be willing to listen to
explanations on how this could be so.
-- 
 I like vegetables that start with "a". Artichokes, avocadoes, etc.
 Some of the "b"s are ok, like broccoli, but brussels sprouts are out.
 As for cabbage, forget it!


 Phil Ngai (408) 749-5720
 UUCP: {ucbvax,decwrl,ihnp4,allegra}!amdcad!phil
 ARPA: amdcad!phil@decwrl.ARPA