Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/3/85; site ukma.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ukma!david From: david@ukma.UUCP (David Herron, NPR Lover) Newsgroups: net.mail Subject: Re: Mail routing -- problems showing up Message-ID: <1994@ukma.UUCP> Date: Sun, 28-Jul-85 22:35:49 EDT Article-I.D.: ukma.1994 Posted: Sun Jul 28 22:35:49 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 31-Jul-85 01:51:11 EDT References: <3018@nsc.UUCP> <2875@topaz.ARPA> <4787@mit-eddie.UUCP> Reply-To: david@ukma.UUCP (David Herron, NPR Lover) Distribution: net Organization: Univ. of KY Mathematical Sciences Lines: 44 In article <4787@mit-eddie.UUCP> gds@mit-eddie.UUCP (Greg Skinner) writes: >I have always held that there should be precedence-specifying characters >(i know parens are already in use, but we could use another character >like {, or even change rfc822, for the purposes of cross-net mailing >where domains are not yet in effect). It's not that hard to do, and it >makes sense (like in a compiler). > >I should never be restricted to expressions like > >2 * 3 + 4 > >in my programming language if I have a need to multiply the quantity 3 + >4 by 2, I should be (and am able) to do this by saying > >2 * (3 + 4) > >I shouldn't have to worry about my context (am I in a *-over-+ >environment, or not?). Similarly, if I'm on a machine that has >!-over-@, I should be able to get my UUCP mail through another ARPA >machine if I need to, e.g. > >{allegra!friend}@harvard.arpa I agree ... However, the way I read rfc822, the <> characters do what you want. Your example becomes @harvard.arpa And there's other ways using rfc822 to specify routing. Like, @harvard.arpa,friend@allegra.uucp will work. (I may not have that EXACTLY correct... the , may be a : f'rinstance). The real problem is that not everybody will convert to rfc822 mailers. -- --- David Herron --- ARPA-> ukma!david@ANL-MCS.ARPA --- UUCP-> {ucbvax,unmvax,boulder,oddjob}!anlams!ukma!david --- {ihnp4,decvax,ucbvax}!cbosgd!ukma!david