Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site cbdkc1.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!tektronix!uw-beaver!cornell!vax135!houxm!ihnp4!cbosgd!cbdkc1!tjs
From: tjs@cbdkc1.UUCP ( Tom Stanions)
Newsgroups: net.med
Subject: Re: Sugar - harmless, no - deadly, yes
Message-ID: <1065@cbdkc1.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 26-Jul-85 13:36:21 EDT
Article-I.D.: cbdkc1.1065
Posted: Fri Jul 26 13:36:21 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 28-Jul-85 17:08:29 EDT
References: <1053@cbdkc1.UUCP> <835@turtlevax.UUCP> <226@bbncc5.UUCP>
Reply-To: tjs@dkc1.UUCP ( Tom Stanions)
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Columbus
Lines: 24
Xref: tektronix net.med:01884 

In article <226@bbncc5.UUCP> sdyer@bbncc5.UUCP (Steve Dyer) writes:
>> Sugar has also been shown to cause temporary insanity.  Wintess the
>> "Twinkie Case", that of Dan White, a Coke and Twinkie addict, who shot
>
>Um, just because a jury is foolish enough to buy a cockamamie ploy
                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>by a lawyer, we needn't consider it scientific evidence.  By the way,
 ^^^^^^^^^^^
>White was "paroled" not "acquitted."
>-- 
>/Steve Dyer
>{decvax,linus,ima,ihnp4}!bbncca!sdyer
>sdyer@bbnccv.ARPA

Alright Steve, my turn.  I would like to know your source for knowing that his
lawyer made this up.  And where is the proof that the ploy way "cockamamie" and
not real?  And how do you know that the jury was foolish?

There is another similar case given in the book "Body, Mind, & Sugar" where a
man killed a child while experiencing extreme tention and hyper-insulinism.
But he didn't get off, I think that maybe his jury was foolish.


{allegra|ihnp4}!cbdkc1!tjs