Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site petrus.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!mhuxn!mhuxr!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!bellcore!petrus!mwg
From: mwg@petrus.UUCP (Mark Garrett)
Newsgroups: net.med
Subject: Re: Re: expecting father & nutrasweet
Message-ID: <428@petrus.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 29-Jul-85 13:48:47 EDT
Article-I.D.: petrus.428
Posted: Mon Jul 29 13:48:47 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 31-Jul-85 04:31:26 EDT
References: <771@burl.UUCP> <787@mtuxo.UUCP> <193@omen.UUCP> <188@steinmetz.UUCP> <202@omen.UUCP>
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Inc
Lines: 22

++
> Perhaps a product which is a mixture of cyclamates and some weak poison
> could be approved.  The purpose of the poison would be to inhibit cancerous
> growths by gigadoses of the material as was done with saccahrin and/or
> cycalamates.

Hey people, does this guy make any sense to you?  Or is it just me?


> By the way, studies have suggested a significant correlation of certain
> types of cancer with levels of sugar consumption found in the general
> population.  No study has ever found a siginificant correlation between
> consumption of aritficial sweeteners and any form of cancer.
> -- Chuck Forsberg

Studies???...Studies?...What studies?  References, Please!!!
By now I think they are necessary.  We seem to have exhausted all of the
interesting combinations of shouting our dogmas at each other.
WHERE'S THE BEEF, CHUCK!!?!!

-Mark Garrett
...allegra!bellcore!mwg