Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!prls!amdimage!amdcad!decwrl!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!brl-tgr!tgr!vortex!lauren@RAND-UNIX.ARPA From: lauren@RAND-UNIX.ARPA Newsgroups: net.micro Subject: software copying and protection (a personal opinion) Message-ID: <409@brl-tgr.ARPA> Date: Sat, 3-Aug-85 23:52:34 EDT Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.409 Posted: Sat Aug 3 23:52:34 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 6-Aug-85 06:02:29 EDT Sender: news@brl-tgr.ARPA Lines: 34 There clearly is one pretty much fullproof method for copy-protecting software. You put everything on one chip. Code, CPU, memory, the works. Expensive? Sure, at least for now. Practical? Maybe for some applications, not for all, certainly. Desirable? Well, that's another matter entirely. But the point is that it COULD be done. But... Short of the one-chip "solution," my personal feeling is that copy-protection is pretty much a waste of time. From what I can see at this point, dongles seem like an awful lot of hassle and may prove to be less secure than many proponents would suggest at this time. Disk-based copy-protection could always be beaten if someone put enough time or effort into the job, and after that oodles of copies could be made from the one cracked copy. Luckily, most people in our culture are comparatively reasonable about being willing to pay for something they consider useful. Software isn't the sort of thing (unlike food and shelter) that you absolutely cannot live without! I personally feel that any company that puts forth a good product, and provides useful and ongoing support has comparatively little to worry about regarding "software piracy." Some illicit copying will go on, of course. But there are enough individuals and companies who feel that a good product and good support is a package that has true worth, and is worthy of being paid for, to provide such software manufacturers with a very reasonable return to help pay the rent, feed the kids, and fund the time required for future development and support itself. My opinion, anyway. --Lauren--