Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.7 $; site ccvaxa
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!ccvaxa!tucker
From: tucker@ccvaxa.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.micro
Subject: Re: Amiga vs. ST
Message-ID: <900001@ccvaxa>
Date: Fri, 2-Aug-85 11:31:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: ccvaxa.900001
Posted: Fri Aug  2 11:31:00 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 6-Aug-85 09:13:37 EDT
References: <268@ihnet.UUCP>
Lines: 10
Nf-ID: #R:ihnet.UUCP:-26800:ccvaxa:900001:000:405
Nf-From: ccvaxa.UUCP!tucker    Aug  2 10:31:00 1985



    Its obvious that the hardware in the Amiga is far better than the
Atari ST series (not the other way around).  Too bad it costs a hell of
a lot more than the Atari will.  Since the machines are so similar, that
will really hurt the Amiga.  Someone at Comm. better get their head out
of the sand and look at whats going on if they expect them to sell.

Tim Tucker
..ucbvax!ihnp4!uiucdcs!ccvaxa!tucker