Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site dual.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!sunybcs!dual!mats
From: mats@dual.UUCP (Mats Wichmann)
Newsgroups: net.micro.att
Subject: Re: ATT 3b2 (SVR2) questions
Message-ID: <1058@dual.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 28-Jul-85 14:24:56 EDT
Article-I.D.: dual.1058
Posted: Sun Jul 28 14:24:56 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 29-Jul-85 06:58:28 EDT
References: <746@wlcrjs.UUCP>, <373@cuae2.UUCP> <513@bu-cs.UUCP> <2471@sun.uucp>
Organization: Dual Systems, Berkeley, CA
Lines: 12

This VMIN/VTIME business is being carefully described in the IEEE P1003
proposals as well...and has been the cause of some head-banging,
not suprisingly. The business of sharing entries in the c_cc array,
depending on how some of the other flags have been set up, is
how shall we say, a bit distasteful....and the addition of
SWTCH for c_cc[7] (for shl) makes hash of the rather sensible idea of
using c_cc[6,7] for VMIN and VTIME. Oh well, time to grow
the array....

    Mats Wichmann
    Dual Systems
    ...{ucbvax,ihnp4,cbosgd,decwrl,fortune}!dual!mats