Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ncoast.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!cwruecmp!hal!ncoast!bsa
From: bsa@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon Allbery)
Newsgroups: net.micro.att,net.unix-wizards
Subject: Unix uptime
Message-ID: <823@ncoast.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 30-Jul-85 10:51:37 EDT
Article-I.D.: ncoast.823
Posted: Tue Jul 30 10:51:37 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 2-Aug-85 22:06:09 EDT
References: <2067@ucf-cs.UUCP> <363@cuae2.UUCP> <2423@sun.uucp> <406@petrus.UUCP> <2453@sun.uucp> <121@tommif.UUCP>
Reply-To: bsa@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon Allbery)
Followup-To: net.micro.att
Organization: North Coast Xenix, Cleveland, OH
Lines: 22
Xref: linus net.micro.att:386 net.unix-wizards:11314

Expires:

Quoted from <121@tommif.UUCP> ["Re: instability in Berkeley versus AT&T releases"], by tom@tommif.UUCP (Tom Faulhaber)...
+---------------
| > 	4:00pm  up 5 days,  2:33,  6 users,  load average: 0.23, 0.07, 0.00
| > 
| 
| machine had been up for 45 days.  These machines had rebooted after PG&E 
+---------------

We've shown an uptime of over 4 MONTHS (I believe it was ~ 140 days).
Microsoft Xenix 2.3a (TRS-Xenix 1.3.2) at the time.  The only reason we've had
downtime is to upgrade from 1.3.2 up ultimately to 3.0.1 (Xenix 3.0), and
to format floppies since diskutil is, regrettably, standalone.

I post this not to show off, but to note that an uptime war between AT&T and
BSD is just a bit ridiculous.  I thought unix-wizards were more mature than
that.  (Or did this cross over from net.unix?  If so, send it back!)

--bsa
-- 
Brandon Allbery, Unix Consultant -- 6504 Chestnut Road, Independence, OH 44131
decvax!cwruecmp!ncoast!bsa; ncoast!bsa@case.csnet; +1 216 524 1416; 74106,1032
========================> Trekkies have Warped minds. <=======================