Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site cmu-cs-spice.ARPA Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!cmu-cs-pt!cmu-cs-spice!tdn From: tdn@cmu-cs-spice.ARPA (Thomas Newton) Newsgroups: net.micro.mac Subject: Re: spacing (MS-WORD flame, actually) Message-ID: <405@cmu-cs-spice.ARPA> Date: Tue, 30-Jul-85 12:48:55 EDT Article-I.D.: cmu-cs-s.405 Posted: Tue Jul 30 12:48:55 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 1-Aug-85 05:20:18 EDT Organization: Carnegie-Mellon University, CS/RI Lines: 44 How is MS-WORD more user-hostile and confusing than MacWrite? At least in WORD I don't need to devote half the screen area to rulers if I'm typing in paragraphs with different formats. I also find the ability to work with more than one document at a time and to split a window very useful. MacWrite only lets you work with one document at a time, and only gives you one view of that document. My two major complaints with WORD are (1) Although Microsoft put in keyboard equivalents for mouse/menu commands, they didn't go far enough. To move the cursor and select text, you must press COMMAND, OPTION, and sometimes the SHIFT key in addition to one of the non-alphanumeric keys on the right hand side of the keyboard. When I'm using Emacs, I very rarely need to press more than two keys at once. And what did Microsoft do with the more desirable COMMAND-key combinations? They devoted them to such "common" functions as repagination!!! (2) If you want to change the number of columns in the middle of a document, you generally must break across page boundaries. For example, there is no way to print a two-column article with a large one-column title/introduction, unless you break it into two documents: The title page, two-column with a large header and with the page boundaries changed The rest of the document The only way to tell it "break this page into one-column and two-column pieces" seems to be to change the page boundaries and use an extra-large header on the first page. But since the page boundary setting is global, this screws the rest of the document. So you are forced to break one document into two pieces, or to choose a formatting that it can handle. By and large, the things that WORD has problems with (other than slow printing on the LaserWriter) seem to be features that don't even exist in MacWrite. So yes, WORD has problems, but I'll take it over MacWrite any day of the week. Now if only they'd put in a basic Gosling EMACS-like set of keyboard commands (programmability is too much to hope for) and make the formatter smarter about multi-column documents... -- Thomas Newton