Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ecsvax.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!mcnc!ecsvax!dgary From: dgary@ecsvax.UUCP (D Gary Grady) Newsgroups: net.micro.pc Subject: Re: software protection - dongles & economics Message-ID: <1677@ecsvax.UUCP> Date: Wed, 17-Jul-85 11:11:48 EDT Article-I.D.: ecsvax.1677 Posted: Wed Jul 17 11:11:48 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 19-Jul-85 01:13:06 EDT Organization: Duke U Comp Ctr Lines: 30 A few people have pooh-poohed the notion that stopping piracy would lead to lower software prices. Their argument generally goes, "In Econ class we were taught that higher demand leads to a higher price." Without going into the wilds of economics, this is an obvious example of a little learning being a dangerous thing. By that logic we'd find that, say, vertical market software would be much cheaper than Lotus 1-2-3! The question of pricing is incredibly complicated, and comments of that sort, like those about the "comparable worth" of books and software, reveal considerable naivte about economics and business. Except for cases of price gouging in which a seller overprices a bona fide necessity that people HAVE to buy, it is difficult to see how someone can maliciously overprice something. If the price of something is higher than its worth to the buyer, only an idiot would buy it. When businesses set a price they try to find one that produces the maximum profit. A price too high pushes down volume so total revenues are less, so villainous overpricing is its own punishment. And why should someone price an item below its worth to the buyer just because the cost of making it is lower? If you believe price should only reflect actual cost, I suppose you're going to go to your employer tomorrow and say, "Look, I work about the same hours as somebody at McDonald's, so why don't you pay me the same thing?" -- D Gary Grady Duke U Comp Center, Durham, NC 27706 (919) 684-3695 USENET: {seismo,decvax,ihnp4,akgua,etc.}!mcnc!ecsvax!dgary