Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83 (MC840302); site chalmers.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!mcvax!enea!chalmers!johnsson
From: johnsson@chalmers.UUCP (Thomas Johnsson)
Newsgroups: net.arch,net.lang.c,net.micro,net.micro.pc,net.micro.68k
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Need 286 "C" benchmark
Message-ID: <307@chalmers.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 28-Jul-85 23:27:13 EDT
Article-I.D.: chalmers.307
Posted: Sun Jul 28 23:27:13 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 26-Jul-85 00:45:21 EDT
Organization: Dept. of CS, Chalmers, Sweden
Lines: 22
Xref: linus net.arch:1382 net.lang.c:5232 net.micro:9887 net.micro.pc:4388 net.micro.68k:967


> The bottom line is which machine offers the best SOLUTION. The processor
> inside should not matter to the end-user. After all, usability is usually
> more dependent on software than on hardware.

I absolutely agree. But it makes me wonder the application programs
that AREN'T developed because of a messy or impossible architecture.





-- 
**** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH BUG DROPPINGS ****
____________________________________________________________
Thomas Johnsson
  UUCP:  johnsson@chalmers.uucp  or ..decvax!mcvax!enea!chalmers!johnsson
  CSNET: johnsson@chalmers.csnet
  Mail on dead trees: Dept. of CS, Chalmers University of Technology, 
                      S-412 96 Goteborg, Sweden
  phone: dept: +46 (0)31 810100, home sweet home: +46 (0)31 252724    
  UFOs, please land at:  57.43 N,  11.59 E (the green hilly lawn)