Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/3/84; site sesame.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!sesame!slerner From: slerner@sesame.UUCP (Simcha-Yitzchak Lerner) Newsgroups: net.micro.pc Subject: Re: what's wrong with this protection? Message-ID: <231@sesame.UUCP> Date: Tue, 30-Jul-85 23:37:02 EDT Article-I.D.: sesame.231 Posted: Tue Jul 30 23:37:02 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 1-Aug-85 07:52:33 EDT References: <785@aluxe.UUCP> Organization: Lotus Development Corp Lines: 32 > I think that instead of wasting their(software companies) money on some > doo-dad the family Rover will inevitably chew up, they should have put their > money into developing a small (2 inch maybe) removable optical disc(YES a CD > ROM!) Transfer rates at winnie rates, cheap(look at your local record store), > not reproducible(at least not yet!) and relatively immune to environmental > factors(dogs excluded!). I have a few problems with this. First, a key ring (the equivilant of the CD player) will cost <$25 in bulk. Some vendors may give them away so that people will be able to run their protected software. I don't see many PC's with CD players yet, and a vendor sure as #$&^ won't be able to give those away. Therefore, the cost becomes prohibitive until CDs become common in the marketplace... A more serious problem, at least in terms of technical corectness: The software _theif_ doesn't need to copy the CD onto another CD, he can just copy the software onto a floppy. (Don't say that we could encrypt the CD to avoid this, you get into the same jamb that you have now. How do you multi-task if you spend all your time switching CDs?) -- Opinions expressed are public domain, and do not belong to Lotus Development Corp. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Simcha-Yitzchak Lerner {genrad|ihnp4|ima}!wjh12!talcott!sesame!slerner {cbosgd|harvard}!talcott!sesame!slerner slerner%sesame@harvard.ARPA