Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site peregrine.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!decwrl!greipa!pesnta!pertec!peregrine!mike
From: mike@peregrine.UUCP (Mike Wexler)
Newsgroups: net.arch,net.lang.c,net.micro,net.micro.pc,net.micro.68k
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Need 286 "C" benchmark
Message-ID: <148@peregrine.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 31-Jul-85 20:06:01 EDT
Article-I.D.: peregrin.148
Posted: Wed Jul 31 20:06:01 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 4-Aug-85 04:54:31 EDT
References: <307@chalmers.UUCP>
Organization: Peregrine Systems, Irvine, Ca
Lines: 23
Xref: linus net.arch:1426 net.lang.c:5353 net.micro:10039 net.micro.pc:4526 net.micro.68k:975

> 
> > The bottom line is which machine offers the best SOLUTION. The processor
> > inside should not matter to the end-user. After all, usability is usually
> > more dependent on software than on hardware.
> 
> I absolutely agree. But it makes me wonder the application programs
> that AREN'T developed because of a messy or impossible architecture.
>
I can name one.  Peregrine Four.  It was developed by Peregrine
Systems and has been delayed by at least a year(our latest schedule
says six months from now).

Mike Wexler
15530 Rockfield, Building C
Irvine, Ca 92718
(714)855-3923
(trwrb|pesnta|scgvaxd)!pertec!peregrine!mike
-- 
Mike Wexler
15530 Rockfield, Building C
Irvine, Ca 92718
(714)855-3923
(trwrb|pesnta|scgvaxd)!pertec!peregrine!mike