Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site tekcrl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!tektronix!tekcrl!terryl
From: terryl@tekcrl.UUCP ()
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: Re: Terminator question
Message-ID: <197@tekcrl.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 19-Jul-85 14:23:12 EDT
Article-I.D.: tekcrl.197
Posted: Fri Jul 19 14:23:12 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 21-Jul-85 04:19:23 EDT
References: <270@CS-Mordred>, <736@asgb.UUCP>
Lines: 13

>I have another question about this film.  Does anybody else beleive that
>the "human who came thru the future" (I forget his name too) was actually
>Sarah's son?  There seemed to be several subtle references to it like his
>saying he has always loved her.  This would add a really interesting twist
>to the story (I know, the twist is back in the category of causality in
>time travel stories, but I think it was left subtle enough to be merely
>interesting, and not trite).  Anybody else think this is or isn't possible?

     Kyle Reese, the human who came back through the future, WASN'T Sarah's
son!!! He was the father of Sarah's son who organized all of the people in
the future. They (whoever made the Terminator) thought that by sending the
Terminator back in time to kill Sarah, so she couldn't have her son, and thus
killing off the organizer.