Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.7 $; site uiucdcsb
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcsb!goldsten
From: goldsten@uiucdcsb.Uiuc.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: Re: Terminator question
Message-ID: <10000148@uiucdcsb>
Date: Fri, 19-Jul-85 17:07:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: uiucdcsb.10000148
Posted: Fri Jul 19 17:07:00 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 22-Jul-85 05:03:31 EDT
References: <270@CS-Mordred>
Lines: 10
Nf-ID: #R:CS-Mordred:-27000:uiucdcsb:10000148:000:581
Nf-From: uiucdcsb.Uiuc.ARPA!goldsten    Jul 19 16:07:00 1985


I have another question about this film.  Does anybody else beleive that
the "human who came thru the future" (I forget his name too) was actually
Sarah's son?  There seemed to be several subtle references to it like his
saying he has always loved her.  This would add a really interesting twist
to the story (I know, the twist is back in the category of causality in
time travel stories, but I think it was left subtle enough to be merely
interesting, and not trite).  Anybody else think this is or isn't possible?
*********
Not possible since we already know who Sarah's son is.