Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site greipa.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!decwrl!greipa!jordan
From: jordan@greipa.UUCP (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: Re: Terminator question
Message-ID: <295@greipa.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 18-Jul-85 18:49:57 EDT
Article-I.D.: greipa.295
Posted: Thu Jul 18 18:49:57 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 26-Jul-85 03:32:26 EDT
References: <270@CS-Mordred> <736@asgb.UUCP>
Reply-To: jordan@greipa.UUCP (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Organization: Genstar Rental Electronics, Palo Alto, Ca.
Lines: 30

In article <736@asgb.UUCP> mah@asgb.UUCP (Mark Hamilton) writes:
>I have another question about this film.  Does anybody else beleive that
>the "human who came thru the future" (I forget his name too) was actually
>Sarah's son?  There seemed to be several subtle references to it like his
>saying he has always loved her.  This would add a really interesting twist
>to the story (I know, the twist is back in the category of causality in
>time travel stories, but I think it was left subtle enough to be merely
>interesting, and not trite).  Anybody else think this is or isn't possible?
>

No, that's not possible because her son was the one that led the
resistance movement. Kyle (the man from the future) was one of his
soldiers (presumably his right-hand man, to be entrusted with her
picture). He always loved her (Sarah) because she was sort of a hero
to all of the future fighters, having raised her son the way she
did. He also describes her son to her in the movie in the the third person.

(Besides, if you were the leader of the resistance movement, would
you be allowed to go galavanting off into the past?)

Nope, Kyle's her son's father.. Not her son.
-- 
			Jordan K. Hubbard
			@ Genstar Rental Electronics.
			Palo Alto, CA.
			{pesnta, decwrl, dual, pyramid}!greipa!jordan

			"ack pfffft. gag. retch. barf.. ack"

				- Bill again.