Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site tekcrl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!tekcrl!terryl
From: terryl@tekcrl.UUCP ()
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: Re: _Return_of_the_Jedi_  (spoiler)
Message-ID: <211@tekcrl.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 30-Jul-85 21:52:15 EDT
Article-I.D.: tekcrl.211
Posted: Tue Jul 30 21:52:15 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 1-Aug-85 22:30:09 EDT
References: <2501@ut-sally.UUCP>, <473@h-sc1.UUCP>
Lines: 16

>>                        _Return_ofthe_Jedi_
>>                         by Kelvin Thompson
>> 
>> _Return_of_the_Jedi_ is a bad movie.  In its predecessors producer George
>> Lucas (_American_Graffiti_) sketched out a clear, wonderful path for his
>> immortal saga to follow, but this latest installment takes a wrong turn
>> with every twist in its plot.

>OHMYGOD!!!!!!!! I *agree* with a Kelvin Thompson review.  Uh oh folks ...
>My mind is going ... I can feel it ...


     Not only that, but if you read very carefully and can remember his
review of "Star Wars: A New Hope", he contradicts himself in this review
by indirectly saying that "A New Hope" was a very good movie. Now, can you
trust a reviewer that will contradict things he's said in the past???