Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site sdcc12.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcc3!sdcc12!nm34
From: nm34@sdcc12.UUCP (nm34)
Newsgroups: net.music.gdead
Subject: Re: Original vs. Remixed Albums
Message-ID: <418@sdcc12.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 22-Jul-85 11:02:03 EDT
Article-I.D.: sdcc12.418
Posted: Mon Jul 22 11:02:03 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 26-Jul-85 04:05:36 EDT
References: <3120@decwrl.UUCP>
Organization: U.C. San Diego, Academic Computer Center
Lines: 16
Summary: Remixed and not?


     I'm going to have to check, I have both remixed and not of the
Anthem, but I dont think that the remixed Anthem indicates that it was
tampered with.  Perhaps the two young Deadheads were confused over which
was remixed and which was not.  I cant imagine why someone would pine
over the remixed version.  It must be easy to find in used record
stores. It is the un-re that has always been hard to find.  I got mine
from an old friend that bought it when it first came out.  I  am more of
a deader than he, so he traded it with me for a Weather Report album.  

    It had always bothered me as to why the Dead (I think it was Bob and
Betty) changed those albums.  I had never seen an interview about the
subject.  The recently released book "Playing in the Band" quotes Lesh
as saying that it was a real mistake.  I couldn't agree more stongly. 

                        Andy Bindman