Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!desoto!packard!ihnp1!ihnp4!mhuxn!mhuxr!ulysses!ucbvax!spp From: spp@ucbvax.ARPA (Stephen P Pope) Newsgroups: net.music.gdead Subject: Re: Brent...and Keith Message-ID: <9516@ucbvax.ARPA> Date: Wed, 31-Jul-85 17:08:27 EDT Article-I.D.: ucbvax.9516 Posted: Wed Jul 31 17:08:27 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 2-Aug-85 02:08:02 EDT References: <3363@decwrl.UUCP> Organization: University of California at Berkeley Lines: 30 Summary: More on Brent Seth Jackson's sentiments on Brent and Keith pretty much correspond to my own. As with Seth, deadheads of my personal acquaintance have never really accepted Brent as a member of the band. For those of you without tape collections who would like to be exposed some excellent examples of Keith's piano playing, try listening to sides 5 and 6 of Europe 72. Most people agree though that by the time Keith left the group he was not worth much musically. I have personally never liked Brent's keyboard playing, singing or stage appearance. But don't just take my word for it. Most of the concerts I've been to of late, the rest of the dead are paying very little attention to Brent. The occasional Brent solos and Brent songs (unfortunately increasing in number as the years go by) seem to be more the result of an executive decision than of musical interest. On rare occasions Brent actually gets into something with Jerry or one of the other dead, and at these times I find him fairly interesting. But it looks to me like his major musical purpose is to provide rhythmical and chordal filler that the Dead seem to require these days. It is interesting to note that in times past, mainly 1970 and 71, the Dead would go through most of their material with no keyboard accompaniment at all. Perhaps they would not be able to hold together so well these days with no keyboards, but I for one would love to see them try. steve pope (ucbvax!spp)