Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site uwmacc.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!uwvax!uwmacc!dubois From: dubois@uwmacc.UUCP (Paul DuBois) Newsgroups: net.origins Subject: Re: Vestigal Organs Message-ID: <1289@uwmacc.UUCP> Date: Tue, 16-Jul-85 18:36:51 EDT Article-I.D.: uwmacc.1289 Posted: Tue Jul 16 18:36:51 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 20-Jul-85 04:23:39 EDT References: <2156@ut-sally.UUCP> <347@scgvaxd.UUCP> <285@phri.UUCP> <358@scgvaxd.UUCP> <323@phri.UUCP> <861@umcp-cs.UUCP> Organization: UW-Madison Primate Center Lines: 34 > [Paul Torek] > Indeed, many insect species have "vestigal" wings, which are small > non-functional organs sitting right where the wings were/are on the > closest related species. If there's a God who created all species > from scratch, He must be trying awful hard to trick us into believing > in evolution! No, just trying to see how many people can look at degeneration and say "evolution!" Break comma give me a. Seems to me that a number of creationists have mentioned degeneration as a component of "creation models". How is your example supposed to be inconsistent with that? Or are you trying, in a roundabout way, to support creationists? Thanks, also, for the counterexample to this recent statement. > [Gordon Davisson] > Harmful mutations have no lasting bad influence on a population because > their carriars tend not to have many decendants. Thus, after a while, the > mutation dissapears from the population. Beneficial mutations, on the > other hand, cause their carriers to tend to have more decendants than > the non-carriers, so after a while, most of the population carries the > mutation, and the population has taken a step to the right (so to speak). Never heard of genetic load, I guess... -- | Paul DuBois {allegra,ihnp4,seismo}!uwvax!uwmacc!dubois --+-- | "More agonizing, less organizing." |