Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site t12tst.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!oliveb!hplabs!intelca!t12tst!seshadri
From: seshadri@t12tst.UUCP (Raghavan Seshadri)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: A new voice.
Message-ID: <446@t12tst.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 17-Jul-85 16:14:47 EDT
Article-I.D.: t12tst.446
Posted: Wed Jul 17 16:14:47 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 20-Jul-85 10:06:03 EDT
References: <347@scgvaxd.UUCP> <41500001@ur-univax.UUCP>
Organization: Intel Microprocessor Mfg, Santa Clara
Lines: 14

> first of all, the First Law of Thermodynamics does not apply to the extremely
> unusually conditions during the first seconds after the big bang.
> Even if this wasn't the case, why can't one say that the universe was always
> here.  If you say that God created it, then when and where was God created?
> whatever your anwser is, it can just as easily be applied to the universe.
 
 I have a real problem understanding this reasoning.By saying that God created
it,the religionists are essentially taking the picture out of the known
conundrum of physical laws.Even if it looks like a copout,it cannot be disprovedOn the other hand,whatever you say about God cannot be applied to the
universe which has "got to" obey the laws of physics.I am surprised that even
Bertrand Russell subscribed to this flawed comparison.

-- 
Raghu Seshadri