Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihnet.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!tektronix!uw-beaver!cornell!vax135!houxm!ihnp4!ihnet!eklhad
From: eklhad@ihnet.UUCP (K. A. Dahlke)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: The Scientific Case for Creation: (Part 44)
Message-ID: <263@ihnet.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 23-Jul-85 16:45:26 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihnet.263
Posted: Tue Jul 23 16:45:26 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 26-Jul-85 04:21:03 EDT
References: <402@iham1.UUCP> <389@kontron.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 16

Clayton, I appreciate your comments on "the scientific case for creation" etc.
However, could you paraphrase, or reference the original articles, or whatever?
Your last 5 articles, combined, contained 20%
original text, and 80% quotations.
The "116 categories" really don't merit reposting.
We have all read them in their entirety, once was enough!
A couple sentences would adequately set the stage for your rebuttals.
Not just you, of course, but everyone.
Even at 1200 baud, it is getting to be a problem.
Thanks.
-- 
	I never know what to put in these damn .signature files.
	Everybody expects me to be clever, or profound, or cute, or funny.
	I just can't take the pressure any more.  They're out to get ...
	Doctor? ... Hey, where are you going?  My session isn't over yet!!!
		Karl Dahlke    ihnp4!ihnet!eklhad