Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: notesfiles
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!prls!amdimage!amdcad!amd!pesnta!hplabs!hp-pcd!hpfcla!lief
From: lief@hpfcla.UUCP (lief)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: Orphaned Response
Message-ID: <14600027@hpfcrs.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 23-Jul-85 16:22:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: hpfcrs.14600027
Posted: Tue Jul 23 16:22:00 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 1-Aug-85 21:12:57 EDT
References: <347@scgvaxd.UUCP>
Organization: Hewlett-Packard - Fort Collins, CO
Lines: 24
Nf-ID: #R:scgvaxd:347:hpfcrs:14600027:37777777600:1086
Nf-From: hpfcrs!lief    Jul 23 12:22:00 1985

>There is plenty of evidence, if you would only ALLOW yourself to
>see it.  Go to the Grand Canyon.  Read Scientific American every month.
>Read Nature every week.  Read a good book about evolutionary biology, 
>or paleontology.  Take a course on the subject.  It's all there.  But,
>"There are none so blind as those who will not see."
>
>       Bill Jefferys  8-%
>       Astronomy Dept, University of Texas, Austin TX 78712   (USnail)
>       {allegra,ihnp4}!{ut-sally,noao}!utastro!bill	(uucp)
>       bill%utastro.UTEXAS@ut-sally.ARPA		(ARPANET)
>       /* ---------- */
>
Unfortunately, your evidence is nothing more than your interpretation of the
factual data which all can see.  The evolutionist and the creationist can both
walk down the Grand Canyon, see the very same things, and come away with two
completely different 'evidences', each claiming that the evidence he has
supports his theory.

Perhaps what we need to do is to focus more on the basis for interpretation
of data rather than on the so called evidences.

Lief Sorensen
HP Fort Collins, CO
Uucp ...!hpfcla!lief