Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site psivax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!qantel!hplabs!sdcrdcf!psivax!friesen
From: friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley Friesen)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: The Scientific Case For Posting Followups: (Part 6.022e23)
Message-ID: <610@psivax.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 2-Aug-85 15:50:10 EDT
Article-I.D.: psivax.610
Posted: Fri Aug  2 15:50:10 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 4-Aug-85 10:36:59 EDT
References: <404@iham1.UUCP> <391@kontron.UUCP> <338@phri.UUCP> <616@gitpyr.UUCP>
Reply-To: friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley Friesen)
Distribution: net
Organization: Pacesetter Systems Inc., Sylmar, CA
Lines: 19

In article <616@gitpyr.UUCP> tynor@gitpyr.UUCP (Steve Tynor) writes:
>
>Let's show some restraint.  It doesn't require 2 pages (or even 2
>paragraphs) of quoted material to demonstrate the gist of what someone
>posted. the original article is always available for reference if needed.
>
	Wrong! We expire all news groups after two weeks here, and
non-technical groups(like net.origins) after only one. Since it often
takes over two weeks for me to see a response, I actually *rarely*
have the original article for reference!

	I *do* try to cut out as much material as I can from
inclusions though.
-- 

				Sarima (Stanley Friesen)

{trwrb|allegra|cbosgd|hplabs|ihnp4|aero!uscvax!akgua}!sdcrdcf!psivax!friesen
or {ttdica|quad1|bellcore|scgvaxd}!psivax!friesen