Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site oliven.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!oliveb!oliven!rap From: rap@oliven.UUCP (Robert A. Pease) Newsgroups: net.philosophy,net.religion Subject: Re: More levels of explanation and definitions of free Message-ID: <360@oliven.UUCP> Date: Fri, 19-Jul-85 01:14:00 EDT Article-I.D.: oliven.360 Posted: Fri Jul 19 01:14:00 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 20-Jul-85 10:07:49 EDT References: <6156@umcp-cs.UUCP> <1041@pyuxd.UUCP> <3@umcp-cs.UUCP> <1212@pyuxd.UUCP> Organization: Olivetti ATC; Cupertino, Ca Lines: 31 Xref: watmath net.philosophy:2071 net.religion:7253 Even number of > = Rich Rosen Odd number of > = Paul Torek (I hope I got this right.) >>> .... if by "ULTIMATE sense" you >>> mean choosing ALL the influences on oneself throughout one's life >>> history, nobody has such choice. But that isn't necessary for one's >>> choices now to be free -- as long as those early influences lead to >>> a capacity for "rational evaluative analysis" (r-e-a) by the person. In >>> short, you seem to be arguing >>> 1. No one chooses all the influences on her development. >>> 2. [implicit] Unless one has a choice in all the influences on >>> one's development, one's later actions are not free choices. >>> 3. Therefore, no one has "free will". >>> I deny premise 2. >>Good for you!! Your denying it doesn't change its veracity one bit. Since >>free means "independent of external influences, unfettered, etc.", and since >>you now seem to at least agree that such things directly influence later >>choices, THEY ARE QUITE SIMPLY *NOT* *FREE*!!! First of all, if a person's development has provided the capacity for "rational evaluative analysis" then that person has the ability to decide HOW past influences will affect him/her now. If you don't believe me, then just think about the last time you chose to change the way you react to something. -- Robert A. Pease {hplabs|zehntel|fortune|ios|tolerant|allegra|tymix}!oliveb!oliven!rap