Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!brl-tgr!gwyn
From: gwyn@brl-tgr.ARPA (Doug Gwyn <gwyn>)
Newsgroups: net.physics
Subject: Re: Quantum Mechanics
Message-ID: <208@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Fri, 26-Jul-85 16:46:45 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.208
Posted: Fri Jul 26 16:46:45 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 28-Jul-85 08:05:55 EDT
References: <396@sri-arpa.ARPA> <1005@sdcsvax.UUCP>
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab
Lines: 8

> The multiple worlds interpretation has some severe problems ...

Not all the alternate worlds are equiprobable!  There is no
observable difference between the alternate-worlds QM and the
Copenhagen QM.  It happens that there IS a small chance that
your terminal would have imploded by now, but it is much more
likely that it hasn't.  (And, a posteriori, it is certain that
it hadn't, but that was not a priori the case.)