Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site pedsgd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!tektronix!uw-beaver!cornell!vax135!petsd!pedsgd!bob
From: bob@pedsgd.UUCP (Robert A. Weiler)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Libertarianism and the Police
Message-ID: <216@pedsgd.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 31-Dec-69 18:59:59 EDT
Article-I.D.: pedsgd.216
Posted: Wed Dec 31 18:59:59 1969
Date-Received: Sun, 28-Jul-85 00:46:23 EDT
References: <55@umcp-cs.UUCP> <inmet.7800338> <1594@dciem.UUCP> <kontron.312> <1617@dciem.UUCP> <354@kontron.UUCP> <611@cybvax0.UUCP> <380@kontron.UUCP>
Reply-To: bob@pedsgd.UUCP (Robert A. Weiler)
Organization: Perkin-Elmer, Tinton Falls, NJ
Lines: 17

Organization : Perkin-Elmer DSG, Tinton Falls NJ
Keywords: 

In article <380@kontron.UUCP> cramer@kontron.UUCP (Clayton Cramer) writes:
>1. Consumer research groups like Consumers Union stay afloat financially
>by making the information available in their magazine.  Your statement is
>demonstrably false.
>
Ok, enough is enough. Consumers Union is mentioned over and over by
the Libertarians on the net as example of the success of private
consumer testing organizations. And yet, in their magazines, CU
consistently advocates *MORE* government consumer protection, not less.
Therefore, I submit that we should not subscribe to Libertarian
consumer protection schemes since CU is against it.
And after all, we KNOW we can trust them.

Bob Weiler.