Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site inset.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!mcvax!ukc!icdoc!ist!inset!dave
From: dave@inset.UUCP (Dave Lukes)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Greenpeace
Message-ID: <635@inset.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 2-Aug-85 07:48:51 EDT
Article-I.D.: inset.635
Posted: Fri Aug  2 07:48:51 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 2-Aug-85 21:48:29 EDT
References: <196@stl.UUCP> <1050@diku.UUCP> <2291@flame.warwick.UUCP>
Reply-To: dave@inset.UUCP (Dave Lukes)
Organization: The Instruction Set Ltd, London
Lines: 11
Xpath: icdoc ivax

In article <2291@flame.warwick.UUCP> kay@warwick.UUCP (Kay Dekker) writes:
>You've got my vote and #5 (UK) or so.
And mine.

As to what form it takes, I suggest we ask Greenpeace,
and if they don't mind, WE decide!
(-:GASP, SHOCK, HORROR, PROBE, REAL DECISION made on eunet !!!???!!! :-):-).

My personal favourite is a ``Rebuild Rainbow Warrior'' fund rather than
a general Greenpeace appeal.
Rationale: it's usually easier if you've got a specific aim.