Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mmintl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!pwa-b!mmintl!franka
From: franka@mmintl.UUCP (Frank Adams)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: A new topic -- pressure from the victims
Message-ID: <522@mmintl.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 23-Jul-85 12:29:39 EDT
Article-I.D.: mmintl.522
Posted: Tue Jul 23 12:29:39 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 25-Jul-85 21:12:09 EDT
References: <3965@alice.UUCP>
Reply-To: franka@mmintl.UUCP (Frank Adams)
Organization: Multimate International, E. Hartford, CT
Lines: 20
Summary: Reasons for request


In article <3965@alice.UUCP> ark@alice.UUCP (Andrew Koenig) writes:
>It seems to me that I've been in an increasing number of situations
>recently where someone has insisted that I do something I find
>obnoxious, and where their power to do so has rested in the fact
>that almost no other people stick up for their rights.
> [...]
>
>Example:  these days, when you pay for something with a credit card,
>the merchant will probably insist that you supply your name, address,
>and phone number.

I asked a merchant the other day why she asked for this information
(in this case, phone number only).  The answer was a bit complex, but
what it came down to is the following: if the bank which issued the
credit card refuses the charge, the merchant is not told who the card
is issued to.  Thus, she wants a way to get in touch with you if
something goes wrong.  This could include forgetting to sign the
form, forgetting to imprint the card number, or an error filling in
the form, as well as the cardholder being over the limit.  It does not,
of course, help if the card has been stolen.