Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site hyper.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!stolaf!umn-cs!hyper!brust
From: brust@hyper.UUCP (Steven Brust)
Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers
Subject: Re: New Reads
Message-ID: <226@hyper.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 10-Jul-85 13:07:52 EDT
Article-I.D.: hyper.226
Posted: Wed Jul 10 13:07:52 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 20-Jul-85 11:19:40 EDT
References: <2574@topaz.ARPA>
Organization: Network Systems Corp., Mpls., Mn.
Lines: 22

> 
> 					-- Scott Turner
> 
> (*) Which isn't to say that we don't need a good raging discussion of Covenant
> going.  What would SF-Lovers be if we didn't have one of the following going:
> 
> 	(f) Argument with our token author, S. Brust ("You meant for Jaweh
> 	    to appear evil", "I did not", "You did", "Hey, _I_ wrote the
> 	    book", "So what?  You also like Zelazny.")

This isn't to imply that I don't think the above
is funny (I do), or that I didn't enjoy the comment
(I did), BUT. . .

Does this answer whoever it was who didn't understand
why I felt recluctant to answer criticism?

On the other hand, I do object to being called
a "token" author.  I haven't toked in over a year.
These days I drop acid.

		-- SKZB