Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site topaz.ARPA Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!columbia!topaz!jdecarlo From: jdecarlo@mitre.ARPA Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers Subject: FTL in SF Message-ID: <2811@topaz.ARPA> Date: Fri, 19-Jul-85 12:29:58 EDT Article-I.D.: topaz.2811 Posted: Fri Jul 19 12:29:58 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 21-Jul-85 01:24:47 EDT Sender: daemon@topaz.ARPA Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 22 From: jdecarlo@mitre.ARPA Peter Alfke says: > >Relativity prohibits any transfer >of information at speeds greater than that of light. It doesn't >matter how the information got from one place to another, just the >distance covered per time taken. Upsetting, isn't it? I might add that some assume that our universe is many-dimensioned and the ships make use of that fact to *take short cuts* to their destinations. The usual analogy is that of a line two feet long with it's end points one inch apart. A one dimensional creature travels two feet to go from one end to another, while a two-dimensional creature (or a one dimensional creature in a *spaceship* which can travel in two dimensions) travels one inch. Did the two-dimensional creature violate the speed-of-light limit or not? Creature one would say yes, creature two would say no. (BTW, Macroscope, by Piers Anthony, has a particularly convoluted view of the universe in it, as an example.) John DeCarlo