Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site cornell.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!qantel!hplabs!tektronix!uw-beaver!cornell!nax
From: nax@cornell.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: SO is OK!!!
Message-ID: <3184@cornell.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 16-Jul-85 13:14:59 EDT
Article-I.D.: cornell.3184
Posted: Tue Jul 16 13:14:59 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 19-Jul-85 02:59:17 EDT
Sender: nax@cornell.UUCP
Organization: Cornell Univ. CS Dept.
Lines: 15

From: nax (Nax-Paul)


I think SO (significant other) works fine!  It's vague, but that's
intended, since we're trying to rope together divers situations.
We fail to find a line dividing "SO" and "friend" because of the diversity
of our relationships -- I don't  see the need for finding this
non-existing distiction, anyway...

To some earlier posting where the authors spoke of "the psychological
definition of SO":  Save that baloney for the deli! It seems once you
start defining terms, all that's left to do is argue. Don't analyze it,
enjoy it!

	Doing what needs to be done:		...!cornell!nax