Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site timeinc.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!timeinc!greenber From: greenber@timeinc.UUCP (Ross M. Greenberg) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: More women than men Message-ID: <340@timeinc.UUCP> Date: Sun, 21-Jul-85 02:44:29 EDT Article-I.D.: timeinc.340 Posted: Sun Jul 21 02:44:29 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 25-Jul-85 00:20:54 EDT References: <210@cuuxa.UUCP> <462@unc.UUCP> Reply-To: greenber@timeinc.UUCP (Ross M. Greenberg) Organization: Time, Inc. - New York Lines: 28 Summary: In article <2598@randvax.UUCP> rohn@rand-unix.UUCP (Laurinda Rohn) writes: > >I don't really disagree with this. What really made me angry was the >way Ross phrased part of his posting. I interpreted his statements as >saying that when a woman has another man interested in her in addition >to the one she is currently involved with, that breaking up is "not >such a big deal." I still think that was a very insensitive thing to >say. Breaking up, for most people with any feelings at all, is >*ALWAYS* painful, whether or not there is another party waiting on the >sidelines. It *is* a big deal. > I'm sorry that my writing was so poor as to allow this large a misunderstanding. I never meant to imply that breaking up is painless. It hurts like hell, as I know too well..... The rest of what I have said, though, stands. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Ross M. Greenberg @ Time Inc, New York --------->{vax135 | ihnp4}!timeinc!greenber<--------- I highly doubt that Time Inc. would make me their spokesperson. ---- "I was riding a wombat this morning, 'till it broke its leg. I had to shoot it" -- Ranger on Camel